UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 2, 2011
OR
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-24020
SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 61-1321992 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
101 Bullitt Lane, Suite 450 Louisville, Kentucky 40222 |
(502) 329-2000 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
As of November 1, 2011 the Registrant had 20,001,401 shares of common stock outstanding.
1
SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except for per share data)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Outsourced services |
$ | 75,574 | $ | 59,435 | $ | 209,838 | $ | 169,693 | ||||||||
Products |
15,603 | 13,977 | 42,207 | 29,728 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net revenue |
91,177 | 73,412 | 252,045 | 199,421 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Outsourced services |
68,216 | 55,543 | 189,271 | 157,996 | ||||||||||||
Products |
12,698 | 10,644 | 36,252 | 23,840 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cost of sales |
80,914 | 66,187 | 225,523 | 181,836 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
10,263 | 7,225 | 26,522 | 17,585 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
7,232 | 6,877 | 20,905 | 19,949 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
1,097 | 496 | 2,637 | 969 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
24 | 29 | 80 | 85 | ||||||||||||
Nonrecurring income |
0 | 0 | (3,000 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||
Restructuring expense, net |
356 | 626 | 233 | 2,041 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,554 | (803 | ) | 5,667 | (5,459 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
153 | 612 | 1,608 | 1,796 | ||||||||||||
Other income, net |
(6,489 | ) | (177 | ) | (5,983 | ) | (399 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before taxes |
7,890 | (1,238 | ) | 10,042 | (6,856 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1,808 | 457 | 3,008 | 1,227 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
6,082 | (1,695 | ) | 7,034 | (8,083 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
0 | (196 | ) | (450 | ) | (496 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,082 | $ | (1,891 | ) | $ | 6,584 | $ | (8,579 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.30 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.43 | ) | ||||||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
0.00 | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.03 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.30 | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 0.33 | $ | (0.46 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.30 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.43 | ) | ||||||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
0.00 | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.03 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.30 | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 0.33 | $ | (0.46 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
18,844 | 18,628 | 18,813 | 18,596 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
19,024 | 18,628 | 18,999 | 18,596 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
2
SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
(in thousands, except for share data)
October 2, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | (Note) | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 15,527 | $ | 16,592 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
54,116 | 41,434 | ||||||
Inventory, net |
36,046 | 30,264 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
4,052 | 5,717 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
109,741 | 94,007 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
3,000 | 3,000 | ||||||
Investment in marketable securities |
1,512 | 0 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
60,141 | 68,590 | ||||||
Goodwill |
6,900 | 6,900 | ||||||
Other assets |
6,234 | 7,195 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 187,528 | $ | 179,692 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 57,545 | $ | 39,488 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
24,872 | 22,763 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
0 | 2,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
82,417 | 64,251 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
12,500 | 21,305 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
28,263 | 34,338 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
123,180 | 119,894 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 975,150 shares authorized; no sharesissued |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Series A preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 24,850 shares authorized; noshares issued |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Common stock, non-voting, par value $0.01 per share, 10,000,000 sharesauthorized; no shares issued |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 20,108,635 shares issued and 20,014,901 shares outstanding in 2011 and 19,964,348 shares issued and 19,663,229 shares outstanding in 2010 |
201 | 199 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
148,934 | 148,555 | ||||||
Retained deficit |
(68,045 | ) | (74,629 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(16,741 | ) | (14,324 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, 93,734 and 301,119 shares in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
(1 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
64,348 | 59,798 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 187,528 | $ | 179,692 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Note: The balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for a complete set of financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
(in thousands)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,584 | $ | (8,579 | ) | |||
Loss from discontinued operations |
(450 | ) | (496 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
7,034 | (8,083 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,791 | 11,083 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
754 | 776 | ||||||
Deferred revenue recognized |
(5,163 | ) | (4,584 | ) | ||||
Deferred loan costs recognized |
153 | 287 | ||||||
Write-off of debt issuance costs |
277 | 0 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
(4,189 | ) | (600 | ) | ||||
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory |
564 | 727 | ||||||
Other noncash items |
(2,186 | ) | 669 | |||||
Contributions to pension plans |
(753 | ) | (790 | ) | ||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(12,632 | ) | (8,819 | ) | ||||
Inventory |
(6,346 | ) | (3,012 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
1,138 | 326 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
17,793 | 10,134 | ||||||
Accrued and other liabilities |
1,974 | 1,688 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
9,209 | (198 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures, net |
(3,827 | ) | (1,003 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
4,637 | 721 | ||||||
Changes in nonoperating assets and liabilities |
44 | 7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
854 | (275 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Repayment of former Revolving Credit Agreement |
(10,000 | ) | 0 | |||||
Repayment of former Senior Notes |
(13,305 | ) | 0 | |||||
Net proceeds from Credit Facility |
12,500 | 0 | ||||||
Payments for deferred loan costs |
(387 | ) | 0 | |||||
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
64 | 0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(11,128 | ) | 0 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,065 | ) | (473 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
16,592 | 15,608 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 15,527 | $ | 15,135 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) | Nature of Business |
Sypris is a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. The Company performs a wide range of manufacturing, engineering, design and other technical services, typically under multi-year, sole-source contracts with corporations and government agencies in the markets for truck components and assemblies and aerospace and defense electronics. The Company provides such services through its Industrial and Electronics Groups (Note 14).
(2) | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sypris Solutions, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, Sypris or the Company), and have been prepared by the Company in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Companys operations are domiciled in the United States (U.S.), Mexico and Denmark and service a wide variety of domestic and international customers. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. These unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented, and the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2010 as presented in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
(3) | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05 which provides new guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders equity and instead requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU will not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements, as it only requires a change in the format of the current presentation.
In September 2011, the FASB amended the guidance on the annual testing of goodwill for impairment. The amended guidance will allow companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. This guidance will be effective for the Companys fiscal year ending December 30, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company has determined that this new guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
(4) | Goodwill |
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of December 31 or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that would warrant such a review. The December 31, 2010 review of goodwill indicated that goodwill was not impaired. During the third fiscal quarter of 2011, based on a combination of factors, including declines in revenues within the Electronics Group, declines in the overall government defense market and a decline in the Companys market value of equity, the Company concluded that there were sufficient indicators to require Sypris to perform an interim goodwill impairment analysis.
5
The Company assesses recoverability using a discounted cash flow analysis. The analysis is based upon available information regarding expected future cash flows of each reporting unit discounted at rates consistent with the cost of capital specific to the reporting unit. A growth rate is used to calculate the terminal value of the reporting unit and is added to the present value of the forecasted cash flows. The growth rate is the expected rate at which a reporting units cash flow is projected to grow beyond the period covered by the long-range plan. The cash flow analysis requires significant judgment in our evaluation of the business and establishing an appropriate discount rate and terminal value to apply in the calculation. In selecting these and other assumptions for each business, we consider historical performance, forecasted operating results, expected changes in product mix, general market conditions and industry considerations specific to the business. We make significant assumptions and estimates about the extent and timing of future cash flows, growth rates and discount rates. The cash flows are estimated over a future period of time, which makes those estimates and assumptions inherently subject to a high degree of potential uncertainty. The sum of the calculated fair values of each reporting unit is then reconciled and compared to our total market capitalization, allowing for a reasonable control premium. If the discounted cash flow analysis yields a fair value estimate less than the reporting units carrying value, we proceed to step two of the impairment process. In the second step, the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill is determined by allocating the reporting units fair value to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit.
As a result of the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis performed as of October 2, 2011, the fair value estimate for the Electronics Group, which is the only remaining reporting unit with goodwill, exceeded its carrying value by approximately 5%. Therefore the second step was not necessary. Key assumptions used to determine the fair value estimate of our Electronics Group during the fourth quarter were the expected after-tax cash flows for the period from 2012 to 2014, which include projected improvements in operating margins, a terminal growth rate of 3.0% and a weighted average cost of capital of 16.7%. The terminal rate is consistent with the prior year growth rate of 3.0%. Our analysis included a comparison of our market capitalization to the fair value of the entire enterprise. These and other estimates and assumptions are impacted by economic conditions and expectations of management and may change in the future based on period-specific facts and circumstances
We believe that the assumptions and estimates used to determine the fair value of our reporting unit were reasonable. However, different assumptions could materially affect the results. If the Electronics Groups future cash flows are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required. The Company will continue to monitor the performance of the Electronics Group, the performance of the overall aerospace and defense industry and the Companys market capitalization.
(5) | Discontinued Operations |
On October 26, 2009, the Company sold all of the stock of its wholly owned subsidiary, Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc. for $39,000,000, of which $3,000,000 was deposited in an escrow account in connection with certain customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnifications of the Company. During 2010, the Company was made aware of a potential indemnification claim from the purchaser of Sypris Test & Measurement. The Company estimates that its total liability arising from this claim will not exceed $946,000, of which $450,000 was recorded during the first nine months of 2011. The Company has paid $196,000 related to the claim as of October 2, 2011. The remaining amount has been reserved in accrued liabilities on the Companys consolidated balance sheets. There can be no assurance that similar potential claims will not emerge in the future or that relevant facts and circumstances will not change, necessitating future changes to the estimated liability. This charge is included in loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the consolidated statement of operations.
(6) | Nonrecurring Income |
During the nine months ended October 2, 2011, the Company recognized a gain of $3,000,000 in connection with a settlement regarding prior year volumes with one of its customers.
6
(7) Other income, net
During the three and nine months ended October 2, 2011, the Company recognized gains of $3,561,000 and $3,620,000, respectively primarily related to the disposition of idle assets. Additionally, the Company recognized foreign currency translation gains of $2,811,000 and $2,128,000 for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2011, respectively, related to the net U.S. dollar denominated monetary asset position of our Mexican subsidiary for which the Mexican peso is the functional currency. These gains are included in other income, net on the consolidated statements of operations.
(8) Restructuring, Impairments and Other Nonrecurring Charges
As announced during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company committed to a restructuring program, which included the closure of its Kenton, Ohio facility, significant reductions in the workforce in its Marion, Ohio facility and the integration of its Electronics Group subsidiaries. The purpose of the restructuring program is to reduce fixed costs, accelerate integration efficiencies, exit certain unprofitable product lines and significantly improve operating earnings on a sustained basis. As a result of the restructuring program, the Company recorded a charge of $356,000 and $233,000 for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2011, respectively, which are included in restructuring expense, net on the consolidated statement of operations. Of the $356,000 charge recorded in the third quarter of 2011, $342,000 was for equipment relocation costs and $206,000 represented other costs, primarily related to mothball costs associated with closed or partially closed facilities. Partially offsetting this was a $192,000 gain on the sale of assets that had previously been impaired. The charge of $233,000 for the nine months ended October 2, 2011 consisted of equipment relocation costs and mothball costs partially offset by a $685,000 gain on the sale of assets that had previously been impaired.
A summary of the pre-tax restructuring charges is as follows (in thousands):
Costs Incurred | ||||||||||||||||
Total Program |
Nine Months Ended October 2, 2011 |
Total Recognized to date |
Remaining Costs to be Recognized |
|||||||||||||
Severance and benefit-related costs |
$ | 4,046 | $ | | $ | 4,046 | $ | | ||||||||
Asset impairments |
12,836 | (685 | ) | 12,836 | | |||||||||||
Deferred contract costs write-offs |
17,798 | | 17,798 | | ||||||||||||
Inventory related charges |
7,895 | | 7,895 | | ||||||||||||
Equipment relocation costs |
2,741 | 527 | 2,618 | 123 | ||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
1,501 | | 1,501 | | ||||||||||||
Contract termination costs |
3,209 | | 3,209 | | ||||||||||||
Other |
5,459 | 391 | 5,408 | 51 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 55,485 | $ | 233 | $ | 55,311 | $ | 174 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of restructuring activity and related reserves at October 2, 2011 is as follows (in thousands):
Accrued Balance at December 31, 2010 |
2011 Charge |
Gross Cash Payments |
Accrued Balance at October 2, 2011 |
|||||||||||||
Severance and benefit-related costs |
$ | 267 | $ | | $ | (84 | ) | $ | 183 | |||||||
Asset impairments |
| (685 | ) | 685 | | |||||||||||
Equipment relocation costs |
| 527 | (527 | ) | | |||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
1,173 | | (447 | ) | 726 | |||||||||||
Contract termination costs |
459 | | (357 | ) | 102 | |||||||||||
Other |
| 391 | (391 | ) | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,899 | $ | 233 | $ | (1,121 | ) | $ | 1,011 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
A summary of total expenses recognized to date by reportable segment is as follows (in thousands):
Industrial Group |
Electronics Group |
Total | ||||||||||
Severance and benefit-related costs |
$ | 2,562 | $ | 1,484 | $ | 4,046 | ||||||
Asset impairments |
12,836 | | 12,836 | |||||||||
Deferred contract costs write-offs |
| 17,798 | 17,798 | |||||||||
Inventory related charges |
| 7,895 | 7,895 | |||||||||
Equipment relocation costs |
2,596 | 22 | 2,618 | |||||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
1,501 | | 1,501 | |||||||||
Contract termination costs |
1,868 | 1,341 | 3,209 | |||||||||
Other |
1,777 | 3,631 | 5,408 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 23,140 | $ | 32,171 | $ | 55,311 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total pre-tax costs of $55,485,000 expected to be incurred includes $23,314,000 within the Industrial Group and $32,171,000 within the Electronics Group. The Company expects to incur additional pre-tax costs of $174,000, all within the Industrial Group.
(9) Dana Claim
On March 3, 2006, the Companys largest customer, Dana Corporation (Dana), and 40 of its U.S. subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. On August 7, 2007, the Company entered into a comprehensive settlement agreement with Dana (the Settlement Agreement) to resolve all outstanding disputes between the parties, terminate previously approved arbitration payments and replace three existing supply agreements with a single, revised contract running through 2014. In addition, Dana provided the Company with an allowed general unsecured non-priority claim in the face amount of $89,900,000 (the Claim).
The Claim provided to Sypris was agreed to by Sypris and Dana as consideration for the aggregate economic impact of the various elements the two parties were negotiating. After the aggregate Claim value of $89,900,000 was established, Sypris recorded the claim at the estimated fair value of $76,483,000 and allocated the estimated fair value to each commercial issue negotiated. The revenues and resulting net income associated with each of those issues requiring the Companys continued involvement was deferred and will be recognized over the applicable period of the involvement. For the nine months ended October 2, 2011 and October 3, 2010, the Company recognized into revenue $5,163,000 and $4,584,000, respectively, related to the Claim.
On August 31, 2011, the Company received 143,966 shares of Dana common stock, representing the final distribution to be received in conjunction with the settlement. At October 2, 2011, the cost basis and fair value of the Companys holdings of Dana common stock amounted to $64,000 and $1,512,000, respectively. In accordance with ASC 320-10-25, the $1,448,000 increase in value was recorded as an unrealized holding gain in other comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2011.
(10) Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
The Company computes earnings per share using the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for common stock and participating securities. Restricted stock granted by the Company is considered a participating security since it contains a non-forfeitable right to dividends.
Our potentially dilutive securities include potential common shares related to our stock options and restricted stock. Diluted earnings per share considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except in periods in which there is a loss because the inclusion of the potential common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect. Diluted earnings per share excludes the impact of common shares related to our stock options in periods in which the option exercise price is greater than the average market price of our common stock for the period. There were 1,097,000 and 654,000 potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2011, respectively, because the effect of inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
A reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share is as follows (in thousands):
8
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Earnings attributable to stockholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to stockholders |
$ | 6,082 | $ | (1,695 | ) | $ | 7,034 | $ | (8,083 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
0 | (196 | ) | (450 | ) | (496 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
6,082 | (1,891 | ) | 6,584 | (8,579 | ) | ||||||||||
Less distributed and undistributed earnings allocable to restricted award holders |
(336 | ) | 0 | (325 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders |
$ | 5,746 | $ | (1,891 | ) | $ | 6,259 | $ | (8,579 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to stockholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.30 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.43 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.00 | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.03 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 0.30 | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 0.33 | $ | (0.46 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to stockholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.30 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.43 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.00 | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.03 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 0.30 | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 0.33 | $ | (0.46 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic |
18,844 | 18,628 | 18,813 | 18,596 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average additional shares assuming conversion of potential common shares |
180 | 0 | 186 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted |
19,024 | 18,628 | 18,999 | 18,596 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11) Investment in Marketable Securities
The Companys investment in marketable securities consists exclusively of shares in Dana common stock. The Companys investment in Dana common stock is classified as an available-for-sale security in accordance with ASC 320-10-25 and measured at fair value as determined by a quoted market price (a level 1 valuation under ASC 820-10). The related unrealized holding gains are excluded from operations and recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheets. At October 2, 2011, the Company owned 143,966 common shares of Dana with a market value of $10.50 per share. At October 2, 2011, the gross unrealized gain was approximately $1,448,000. There were no unrealized gains or losses at December 31, 2010. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary will be included in other income or expense, if and when recorded. In accordance with ASC 820-10, the fair value of the shares was valued based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical shares at October 2, 2011.
9
The following table summarizes marketable securities as of October 2, 2011 (in thousands):
Basis | Gross Unrealized Gain/(Loss) |
Gross Realized Gain/(Loss) |
Fair Value At Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) |
|||||||||||||
Marketable securities |
$ | 64 | $ | 1,448 | $ | | $ | 1,512 |
(12) Inventory
Inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):
October 2, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 6,345 | $ | 4,758 | ||||
Work in process |
8,060 | 6,171 | ||||||
Finished goods |
3,745 | 3,729 | ||||||
Costs relating to long-term contracts and programs |
19,014 | 16,431 | ||||||
Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory |
(1,118 | ) | (825 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 36,046 | $ | 30,264 | |||||
|
|
|
|
(13) Debt
Debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
October 2, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Credit Facility |
$ | 12,500 | $ | 0 | ||||
Former Revolving Credit Agreement |
0 | 10,000 | ||||||
Former Senior Notes |
0 | 13,305 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
12,500 | 23,305 | |||||||
Less current portion |
0 | 2,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 12,500 | $ | 21,305 | |||||
|
|
|
|
On May 12, 2011, the Company entered into a new credit facility (Credit Facility) providing total availability up to $50,000,000 that supports short-term funding needs and letters of credit, which replaced the Companys Revolving Credit Agreement and Senior Notes scheduled to expire in January 2012. Loans made under the Credit Facility will mature and the commitments thereunder will terminate in May 2016. The Credit Facility provides for an option, subject to certain conditions, to increase total availability to $60,000,000 in the future. Borrowing availability under the Credit Facility is determined by a monthly borrowing base collateral calculation that is based on specified percentages of the value of eligible accounts receivable, inventory and machinery and equipment, less certain reserves and subject to certain other adjustments.
Obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of our U.S. subsidiaries and are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all domestic assets of the Company.
The Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict our ability to dispose of assets, incur additional indebtedness, incur guarantee obligations, engage in sale and leaseback transactions, prepay other indebtedness, modify organizational documents and certain other agreements, create restrictions affecting subsidiaries, make dividends and other restricted payments, create liens, make investments, make acquisitions, engage in mergers, change the nature of our business and engage in certain transactions with affiliates.
10
(14) Segment Data
The Company is organized into two business groups, the Industrial Group and the Electronics Group. The segments are each managed separately because of the distinctions between products, services, markets, customers, technologies and workforce skills of the segments. The Industrial Group provides manufacturing services for a variety of customers that outsource forged and finished steel components and subassemblies. The Industrial Group also manufactures high-pressure closures and other fabricated products. The Electronics Group provides manufacturing and technical services as an outsourced service provider and manufactures assurance products, including link encryptors, data recording products and electronic key fill devices. There was no intersegment net revenue recognized in any of the periods presented.
The following table presents financial information for the reportable segments of the Company (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Net revenue from unaffiliated customers: |
||||||||||||||||
Industrial Group |
$ | 72,647 | $ | 52,738 | $ | 201,082 | $ | 143,415 | ||||||||
Electronics Group |
18,530 | 20,674 | 50,963 | 56,006 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 91,177 | $ | 73,412 | $ | 252,045 | $ | 199,421 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit: |
||||||||||||||||
Industrial Group |
$ | 6,931 | $ | 2,334 | $ | 19,143 | $ | 7,073 | ||||||||
Electronics Group |
3,332 | 4,891 | 7,379 | 10,512 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 10,263 | $ | 7,225 | $ | 26,522 | $ | 17,585 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Industrial Group |
$ | 4,167 | $ | (54 | ) | $ | 14,816 | $ | (415 | ) | ||||||
Electronics Group |
(342 | ) | 1,319 | (2,655 | ) | 1,010 | ||||||||||
General, corporate and other |
(2,271 | ) | (2,068 | ) | (6,494 | ) | (6,054 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,554 | $ | (803 | ) | $ | 5,667 | $ | (5,459 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15) Commitments and Contingencies
The provision for estimated warranty costs is recorded at the time of sale and periodically adjusted to reflect actual experience. The Companys warranty liability, which is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets, as of October 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $951,000 and $866,000, respectively. The Companys warranty expense for the nine months ended October 2, 2011 and October 3, 2010 was $226,000 and $388,000, respectively.
Additionally, the Company sells three and five-year extended warranties for one of its link encryption products. The revenue from the extended warranties is deferred and recognized ratably over the contractual term. As of October 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had deferred $2,421,000 and $2,076,000, respectively, related to extended warranties.
The Company bears insurance risk as a member of a group captive insurance entity for certain general liability, automobile and workers compensation insurance programs and a self-insured employee health program. The Company records estimated liabilities for its insurance programs based on information provided by the third-party plan administrators, historical claims experience, expected costs of claims incurred but not paid, and expected costs to settle unpaid claims. The Company monitors its estimated insurance-related liabilities on a quarterly basis. As facts change, it may become necessary to make adjustments that could be material to the Companys consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The Company believes that its present insurance coverage and level of accrued liabilities are adequate.
The Company is involved in certain litigation and contract issues arising in the normal course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot, at this time, be predicted in light of the uncertainties inherent therein, management does not expect that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.
11
As of October 2, 2011, the Company had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately $11,179,000, primarily for the acquisition of inventory and manufacturing equipment. As of October 2, 2011, the Company also had outstanding letters of credit of $990,000 primarily under the aforementioned captive insurance program.
(16) Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes includes federal, state, local and foreign taxes. The Companys effective tax rate varies from period to period due to the proportion of foreign and domestic pre-tax income expected to be generated by the Company. The Company provides for income taxes for its domestic operations at a statutory rate of 35% and for its foreign operations at a statutory rate of 30% in 2011 and 2010. The Companys foreign operations are also subject to minimum income taxes in periods where positive cash flows exceed taxable income. Reconciling items between the federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate also include state income taxes, valuation allowances and certain other permanent differences.
The Company recognizes liabilities or assets for the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets or liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. These temporary differences will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of assets or liabilities are recovered or settled. ASC 740 requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company evaluates its deferred tax position on a quarterly basis and valuation allowances are provided as necessary. During this evaluation, the Company reviews its forecast of income in conjunction with other positive and negative evidence surrounding the realizability of its deferred tax assets to determine if a valuation allowance is needed. Based on the current forecast, the Company has established a valuation allowance against the domestic net deferred tax asset. Until an appropriate level and characterization of profitability is attained, the Company expects to continue to maintain a valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets related to future U.S. and certain non-U.S. tax benefits.
(17) Employee Benefit Plans
Pension (benefit) expense consisted of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 9 | $ | 2 | $ | 27 | $ | 33 | ||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
517 | 516 | 1,551 | 1,653 | ||||||||||||
Net amortizations, deferrals and other costs |
146 | 111 | 439 | 399 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(638 | ) | (654 | ) | (1,915 | ) | (1,946 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 34 | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 102 | $ | 139 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
(18) Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the accumulated net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments, employee benefit-related adjustments and foreign currency translation adjustments.
The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,082 | $ | (1,891 | ) | $ | 6,584 | $ | (8,579 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
1,448 | 0 | 1,448 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(6,171 | ) | 1,414 | (3,865 | ) | 1,518 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 1,359 | $ | (477 | ) | $ | 4,167 | $ | (7,061 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following (in thousands):
October 2, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
$ | (5,809 | ) | $ | (1,944 | ) | ||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
1,448 | 0 | ||||||
Employee benefit-related adjustments, net of tax of $2,512 U.S |
(11,889 | ) | (11,889 | ) | ||||
Employee benefit-related adjustments Mexico |
(491 | ) | (491 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | (16,741 | ) | $ | (14,324 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
(19) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are reflected in the consolidated financial statements at their carrying amount which approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The carrying amount of debt outstanding at October 2, 2011 under the Credit Facility approximates fair value because borrowings are for terms of less than six months and have rates that reflect currently available terms and conditions for similar debt.
13
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. We perform a wide range of manufacturing, engineering, design and other technical services, typically under multi-year, sole-source contracts with corporations and government agencies principally in the markets for industrial manufacturing and aerospace and defense electronics.
We focus on those markets where we have the expertise, qualifications and leadership position to sustain a competitive advantage. We target our resources to support the needs of industry leaders that embrace multi-year contractual relationships as a strategic component of their supply chain management. These contracts, many of which are sole-source by part number and are for terms of up to five years, enable us to invest in leading-edge processes or technologies to help our customers remain competitive. The productivity, flexibility and economies of scale that can result offer an important opportunity for differentiating ourselves from the competition when it comes to cost, quality, reliability and customer service.
During the past three years, we have significantly improved our financial condition by reducing fixed costs, accelerating integration efficiencies, exiting certain unprofitable product lines, reducing debt and entering into a new, more favorable debt facility.
While the commercial vehicle and trailer markets continue to rebound from historic lows within our Industrial Group, we continue to face challenges within our Electronics Group, such as the uncertainty in the worldwide macroeconomic climate and its impact on aerospace and defense spending patterns globally, as well as federal government spending in the U.S.
The U.S. Government's continued focus on addressing federal budget deficits and the growing national debt suggests a changing environment for the Electronics Group. Although defense spending is expected to remain a national priority within the federal budget, a fiscally constrained environment could prompt the government to seek additional deficit reduction by moderating discretionary spending, of which defense constitutes the majority share.
The Administration and Congress are engaged in vigorous discussion over alternative approaches to reduce the federal deficit and curtail spending. Some revision to current national security spending could emerge in forthcoming budget plans and appropriations as these negotiations continue. There can be no assurance at this time regarding when and how this matter will be resolved or its effects on the overall U.S. economy or federal budgets. In this context, the Department of Defense is currently conducting a strategic review intended to guide its budgeting decisions. Our Company awaits the results of this review, as well as the outcomes of the broader federal budget discussion, as these decisions are expected to shape planning directions across the industry.
Results of Operations
We operate in two business segments, the Industrial Group and the Electronics Group. The tables presented below, which compare our segment and consolidated results for the three and nine month periods of operations of 2011 to 2010, present the results for each period, the change in those results from 2011 to 2010 in both dollars and percentage change and the results for each period as a percentage of net revenue.
| The first two data columns in each table show the absolute results for each period presented. |
| The columns entitled Year Over Year Change and Year Over Year Percentage Change show the change in results, both in dollars and percentages. These two columns show favorable changes as positive and unfavorable changes as negative. For example, when our net revenue increases from one period to the next, that change is shown as a positive number in both columns. Conversely, when expenses increase from one period to the next, that change is shown as a negative number in both columns. |
14
| The last two columns in each table show the results for each period as a percentage of net revenue. In these two columns, the cost of sales and gross profit for each are given as a percentage of that segments net revenue. These amounts are shown in italics. |
In addition, as used in the table, NM means not meaningful.
Three Months Ended October 2, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended October 3, 2010
Three Months Ended | Year Over Year Change |
Year Over Year Percentage Change |
Results as Percentage of Net Revenue for the Three Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Group |
$ | 72,647 | $ | 52,738 | $ | 19,909 | 37.8 | % | 79.7 | % | 71.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Electronics Group |
18,530 | 20,674 | (2,144 | ) | (10.4 | ) | 20.3 | 28.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
91,177 | 73,412 | 17,765 | 24.2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Group |
65,716 | 50,404 | (15,312 | ) | (30.4 | ) | 90.5 | 95.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Electronics Group |
15,198 | 15,783 | 585 | 3.7 | 82.0 | 76.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
80,914 | 66,187 | (14,727 | ) | (22.3 | ) | 88.7 | 90.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Group |
6,931 | 2,334 | 4,597 | 197.0 | 9.5 | 4.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Group |
3,332 | 4,891 | (1,559 | ) | (31.9 | ) | 18.0 | 23.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
10,263 | 7,225 | 3,038 | 42.0 | 11.3 | 9.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
7,232 | 6,877 | (355 | ) | (5.2 | ) | 7.9 | 9.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
1,097 | 496 | (601 | ) | (121.2 | ) | 1.2 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
24 | 29 | 5 | 17.2 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expense, net |
356 | 626 | 270 | 43.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,554 | (803 | ) | 2,357 | NM | 1.8 | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
153 | 612 | 459 | 75.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
(6,489 | ) | (177 | ) | 6,312 | NM | (7.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before taxes |
7,890 | (1,238 | ) | 9,128 | NM | 8.7 | (1.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1,808 | 457 | (1,351 | ) | NM | 2.0 | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
6,082 | (1,695 | ) | 7,777 | NM | 6.7 | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| (196 | ) | 196 | NM | | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,082 | $ | (1,891 | ) | $ | 7,973 | NM | 6.7 | % | (2.6 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Nine Months Ended October 2, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended October 3, 2010
Nine Months Ended | Year Over Year Change |
Year Over Year Percentage Change |
Results as Percentage of Net Revenue for the Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
Favorable (Unfavorable) |
October 2, 2011 |
October 3, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentage data) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Group |
$ | 201,082 | $ | 143,415 | $ | 57,667 | 40.2 | % | 79.8 | % | 71.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Electronics Group |
50,963 | 56,006 | (5,043 | ) | (9.0 | ) | 20.2 | 28.1 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
252,045 | 199,421 | 52,624 | 26.4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Group |
181,939 | 136,342 | (45,597 | ) | (33.4 | ) | 90.5 | 95.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Electronics Group |
43,584 | 45,494 | 1,910 | 4.2 | 85.5 | 81.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
225,523 | 181,836 | (43,687 | ) | (24.0 | ) | 89.5 | 91.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Group |
19,143 | 7,073 | 12,070 | 170.6 | 9.5 | 4.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Group |
7,379 | 10,512 | (3,133 | ) | (29.8 | ) | 14.5 | 18.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
26,522 | 17,585 | 8,937 | 50.8 | 10.5 | 8.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
20,905 | 19,949 | (956 | ) | (4.8 | ) | 8.3 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
2,637 | 969 | (1,668 | ) | (172.1 | ) | 1.1 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
80 | 85 | 5 | 5.9 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Nonrecurring income |
(3,000 | ) | | 3,000 | NM | (1.2 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expense, net |
233 | 2,041 | 1,808 | 88.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
5,667 | (5,459 | ) | 11,126 | NM | 2.2 | (2.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
1,608 | 1,796 | 188 | 10.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
(5,983 | ) | (399 | ) | 5,584 | NM | (2.4 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before taxes |
10,042 | (6,856 | ) | 16,898 | NM | 4.0 | (3.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
3,008 | 1,227 | (1,781 | ) | (145.2 | ) | 1.2 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
7,034 | (8,083 | ) | 15,117 | NM | 2.8 | (4.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(450 | ) | (496 | ) | 46 | 9.3 | (0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,584 | $ | (8,579 | ) | $ | 15,163 | NM | 2.6 | % | (4.3 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue. The Industrial Group derives its revenue from manufacturing services and product sales. Net revenue in the Industrial Group for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011 increased $19.9 million and $57.7 million from the prior year comparable periods, respectively. Increased sales volumes for medium and heavy duty commercial trucks and trailer axles contributed to increased revenue of approximately $16.0 million and $47.5 million for the three and nine month periods, respectively. Manufacturing services for a new commercial vehicle customer contributed to increased revenue of approximately $1.2 million and $4.3 million for the three and nine month periods, respectively. Increased sales volumes for the off-highway business contributed to increased revenue of $1.3 million and $1.8 million for the three and nine month periods, respectively. Specialty products contributed to increased revenue of approximately $0.7 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine month periods, respectively. Increased steel prices, which are contractually passed through to customers under certain contracts, and pricing adjustments also contributed to increased revenue of approximately $0.8 million and $3.3 million for the three and nine month periods, respectively.
The Electronics Group derives its revenue from product sales and technical outsourced services. Net revenue in the Electronics Group for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011 decreased $2.1 million and $5.0 million from the prior year comparable periods, respectively. The decreases from the prior year are due in
16
part to the completion of certain Electronic Manufacturing and Engineering Services programs and changes in the product mix within our space business. Additionally, the Electronics Group continues to be affected by the delayed approval by Congress of the fiscal 2011 Defense Appropriations Bill. However, we continued to see improvement in order flow during the quarter as funds began to be allocated through various departments and agencies for new program use. Partially offsetting these decreases were increased sales of secured communication and data recording products over each period.
Gross Profit. The Industrial Groups gross profit increased to $6.9 million and $19.1 million in the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, from $2.3 million and $7.1 million in the prior year comparable periods. An increase in sales volume resulted in an increase of gross profit of approximately $3.5 million and $9.9 million for the three and nine month periods, respectively. Price increases resulted in an increase in gross profit of $0.5 million and $1.5 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively. The Industrial Group also realized an increase in gross profit of $0.9 million and $1.9 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, as a result of productivity improvements. These increases were partially offset by additional spending of $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, to prepare for the continued market upturn in the Industrial Group. Additionally, the company experienced a cost increase of $0.2 million and $0.6 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, due to the strengthening of the Mexican Peso average during the period.
The Electronics Groups gross profit decreased $1.6 million and $3.1 million in the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively. The decrease in gross profit is primarily a result of the decline in revenue, particularly in the higher margin Electronic Manufacturing Services (EMS) business and additional engineering charges allocated to improvements in our product portfolio. The Electronics Groups gross profit as a percentage of revenue in the third quarter decreased to 18.0% and 14.5% for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, from 23.7% and 18.8% for the comparable 2010 periods.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $0.4 million and $1.0 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively. However, selling, general and administrative expense decreased as a percentage of revenue to 7.9% and 8.3% for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, as compared to 9.4% and 10.0% for the comparable 2010 periods. The Company has continued to limit increases in controllable general and administrative expenses as revenues have increased in its Industrial Group.
Research and Development. Research and development costs increased $0.6 million and $1.7 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, in support of the Electronics Groups self-funded product and technology development activities. Additionally, during the first nine months of 2010, engineering efforts were redirected to assist with technical issues with existing products, which have since been resolved.
Nonrecurring Income. During the nine months ended October 2, 2011, the Company recognized a gain of $3.0 million in connection with a settlement regarding prior year volumes with one of its customers.
Restructuring Expense. As a result of the Companys restructuring program, we recorded expense of $0.4 million and $0.2 million related to these initiatives during the three and nine months ended October 2, 2011, respectively. During the three and nine month periods ended October 3, 2010, we recorded expense of $0.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The charge for the nine months ended October 2, 2011 consisted of $0.5 million in equipment relocation costs and $0.4 million in other various mothball charges partially offset by a $0.7 million gain on the sale of assets that had previously been impaired.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011 decreased due to a decrease in the weighted average debt outstanding and a decrease in the weighted average interest rate, partially offset by the write-off of $0.3 million in unamortized loan costs and additional fees paid in conjunction with the repayment of our former Revolving Credit Agreement and Senior Notes. Our weighted average debt outstanding decreased to $20.7 million and $20.2 million for the three and nine month periods of 2011, respectively, from $22.3 million and $20.1 million during the three and nine month periods of 2010, respectively. The weighted average interest rate was 2.5% and 6.5% for the three and nine month periods of 2011, respectively, compared to
17
8.7% and 9.2% for the three and nine month periods of 2010, respectively. The reduction in the weighted average interest rates is primarily due to the Company entering into a new credit facility with more favorable interest rate terms on May 12, 2011.
Other Income, Net. Other income net, increased to $6.5 million and $6.0 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, from $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 3, 2010, respectively. Other income for the periods includes gains of $3.6 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, primarily from the sale of idle assets within the Industrial Group. The Company also recognized foreign currency translation gains of $2.8 million and $2.1 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively, related to the net U.S. dollar denominated monetary asset position of our Mexican subsidiary for which the Mexican peso is the functional currency.
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes in the three and nine month periods of 2011 and 2010 is associated primarily with our Mexican subsidiaries.
Discontinued Operations. On October 26, 2009, the Company sold all of the outstanding stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sypris Test & Measurement, for approximately $39.0 million. In accordance with requirements of ASC 205-20-45, the results of the Test & Measurement segment have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. During 2010, the Company was made aware of a potential indemnification claim from the purchaser of Sypris Test & Measurement. As of October 2, 2011, the Company estimates that its total liability arising from this claim will not exceed $0.9 million, of which $0.5 million was charged to loss from discontinued operations, net of tax for the nine months ended October 2, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On May 12, 2011, the Company entered into a new credit facility (Credit Facility) which provides for total availability up to $50.0 million to support short-term funding needs and letters of credit, which replaced the Companys Revolving Credit Agreement and Senior Notes scheduled to expire in January 2012. Loans made under the Credit Facility will mature and the commitments thereunder will terminate in May 2016. The Credit Facility provides for an option, subject to certain conditions, to increase total availability to $60.0 million in the future.
Borrowing availability under the Credit Facility is determined by a monthly borrowing base collateral calculation that is based on specified percentages of the value of eligible accounts receivable, inventory and machinery and equipment, less certain reserves and subject to certain other adjustments. At October 2, 2011 we had total excess availability under the Credit Facility of $27.2 million along with an unrestricted cash balance of $15.5 million, which provides for total cash and borrowing capacity of $42.7 million. Approximately $11.7 million of the unrestricted cash balance relates to our Mexican subsidiaries. Standby letters of credit up to a maximum of $5.0 million may be issued under the Credit Facility, of which $1.0 million were issued at October 2, 2011.
We also had purchase commitments totaling approximately $11.2 million at October 2, 2011, primarily for inventory and manufacturing equipment.
We believe that sufficient resources will be available to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. Our ability to satisfy cash requirements for periods beyond the next twelve months depend on our profitability, our ability to manage working capital requirements and our rate of growth. If our largest customers experience financial difficulty, or if working capital and capital expenditure requirements exceed expected levels during the twelve months or in subsequent periods, we may require additional external sources of capital. There can be no assurance that any additional required financing will be available through bank borrowings, debt or equity financings or otherwise, or that if such financing is available, it will be available on terms acceptable to us. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Financial Condition
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $9.2 million in the first nine months of 2011 as compared to net cash used of $0.2 million for the first nine months of 2010, primarily due to the increase in operating income over the prior year period. The Industrial Groups net revenue increase of $57.7 million resulted
18
in increases in accounts receivable and inventory of $20.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively. The Electronics Groups net revenue decrease generated cash from accounts receivable of $7.6 million during the nine months ended October 2, 2011. However, inventory within the Electronics Group increased primarily as a result of the timing of shipments and the building of inventory for potential sales during the fourth quarter of 2011 and 2012 and used $2.8 million of cash. Accounts payable increased during the nine months ended October 2, 2011 and provided $17.8 million primarily due to increased purchases by our Industrial Group and the timing of payments to our suppliers. Accrued liabilities increased in the same period and provided $2.0 million, primarily as a result of increased accrued taxes for our Mexico operations.
Investing Activities. Net cash provided by investing activities was $0.9 million for the first nine months of 2011 as compared to net cash used of $0.3 million for the first nine months of 2010. Net cash provided by investing activities for the first nine months of 2011 included proceeds of $4.6 million from the sale of certain idle assets within the Industrial Group partially offset by $3.8 million of capital expenditures
Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities was $11.1 million in the first nine months of 2011 due to the repayment of debt under the Companys former Revolving Credit Agreement and Senior Notes partially offset by borrowings of $12.5 million under the new Credit Facility. The Company also paid $0.4 million of deferred loan costs during the period in conjunction with the new Credit Facility. The Companys financing activities were cash neutral for the first nine months of 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies
See the information concerning our critical accounting policies included under Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationCritical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies during the nine month period ended October 2, 2011, other than as described below.
Goodwill. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of December 31 or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that would warrant such a review. The December 31, 2010 review of goodwill indicated that goodwill was not impaired. During the third fiscal quarter of 2011, based on a combination of factors, including declines in revenues within the Electronics Group, declines in the overall government defense market and a decline in the Companys market value of equity, the Company concluded that there were sufficient indicators to require Sypris to perform an interim goodwill impairment analysis.
The Company assesses recoverability using a discounted cash flow analysis. The analysis is based upon available information regarding expected future cash flows of each reporting unit discounted at rates consistent with the cost of capital specific to the reporting unit. A growth rate is used to calculate the terminal value of the reporting unit and is added to the present value of the forecasted cash flows. The growth rate is the expected rate at which a reporting units cash flow is projected to grow beyond the period covered by the long-range plan. The cash flow analysis requires significant judgment in our evaluation of the business and establishing an appropriate discount rate and terminal value to apply in the calculation. In selecting these and other assumptions for each business, we consider historical performance, forecasted operating results, expected changes in product mix, general market conditions and industry considerations specific to the business. We make significant assumptions and estimates about the extent and timing of future cash flows, growth rates and discount rates. The cash flows are estimated over a future period of time, which makes those estimates and assumptions inherently subject to a high degree of potential uncertainty. The sum of the calculated fair values of each reporting unit is then reconciled and compared to our total market capitalization, allowing for a reasonable control premium. If the discounted cash flow analysis yields a fair value estimate less than the reporting units carrying value, we proceed to step two of the impairment process. In the second step, the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill is determined by allocating the reporting units fair value to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit.
As a result of the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis performed as of October 2, 2011, the fair value estimate for the Electronics Group, which is the only remaining reporting unit with goodwill, exceeded its carrying value by approximately 5%. Therefore the second step was not necessary. Key assumptions used to determine the fair value estimate of our Electronics Group during the fourth quarter were the expected after-tax cash flows for the period from 2012 to 2014, which include projected improvements in operating margins, a terminal
19
growth rate of 3.0% and a weighted average cost of capital of 16.7%. The terminal rate is consistent with the prior year growth rate of 3.0%. Our analysis included a comparison of our market capitalization to the fair value of the entire enterprise. These and other estimates and assumptions are impacted by economic conditions and expectations of management and may change in the future based on period-specific facts and circumstances
We believe that the assumptions and estimates used to determine the fair value of our reporting unit were reasonable. However, different assumptions could materially affect the results. If the Electronics Groups future cash flows are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required. The Company will continue to monitor the performance of the Electronics Group, the performance of the overall aerospace and defense industry and the Companys market capitalization.
Precontract Costs. Costs incurred on projects as pre-contract costs are deferred as assets when the Company has been requested by the customer to begin work under a new arrangement prior to contract execution. The Company records pre-contract costs when formal contracts have not yet been executed, and it is probable that the Company will recover the costs through the issuance of a contract. If we determine it is probable that we will be awarded the specific anticipated contract, we capitalize the precontract costs we incur, excluding start-up costs which are expensed as incurred. Capitalized precontract costs of $0.5 million at October 2, 2011 are included in Other assets, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. There were no capitalized precontract costs as of December 31, 2010.
Forward-looking Statements
This quarterly report, and our other oral or written communications, may contain forward-looking statements. These statements may include our expectations or projections about the future of our industries, business strategies, potential acquisitions or financial results and our views about developments beyond our control, including domestic or global economic conditions, trends and market developments. These statements are based on managements views and assumptions at the time originally made, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update these statements, even if, for example, they remain available on our website after those views and assumptions have changed. There can be no assurance that our expectations, projections or views will come to pass, and undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements.
A number of significant factors could materially affect our specific business operations and cause our performance to differ materially from any future results projected or implied by our prior statements. Many of these factors are identified in connection with the more specific descriptions contained throughout this report. Other factors which could also materially affect such future results currently include: potential impairments, non-recoverability or write-offs of goodwill, assets or deferred costs, including capitalized pre-contract costs related to the development of a replacement for certain aerospace and defense; inventory valuation risks including obsolescence, shrinkage, theft, overstocking or underbilling; declining revenues in our aerospace and defense business lines as we transition from legacy products and services into new market segments and technologies; U.S. government spending on products and services that our Electronics Group provides, including the timing of budgetary decisions; potential liabilities associated with discontinued operations, including post-closing indemnifications or claims related to business or asset dispositions; the costs of compliance with our auditing, regulatory or contractual obligations; regulatory actions or sanctions (in each case including FCPA, OSHA and Federal Acquisition Regulations, among others); adverse determinations by government contracting officers, especially regarding the potential retrofit of certain electronic products with respect to alleged latent defects, which are disputed by the Company; dependence on, recruitment or retention of key employees; pension valuation, health care or other benefit costs; labor relations; strikes; union negotiations; changes in licenses, security clearances, or other legal rights to operate, manage our work force or import and export as needed; breakdowns, relocations or major repairs of machinery and equipment; changes or delays in government or other customer budgets, funding or programs; potential weaknesses in internal controls over [financial reporting and] enterprise risk management; reliance on major customers or suppliers, especially in the automotive or aerospace and defense electronics sectors; the cost, efficiency and yield of our operations and capital investments, including working capital, production schedules, cycle times, scrap rates, injuries, wages, overtime costs, freight or expediting costs; our inability to successfully launch or sustain new or next generation programs or product features, especially in accordance with budgets or committed delivery schedules; disputes or litigation, involving customer, supplier, lessor, landlord, creditor, stockholder, product liability or environmental claims; the costs and supply of debt, equity capital, or insurance; fees, costs or other dilutive effects of refinancing, compliance with covenants; cost and
20
availability of raw materials such as steel, component parts, natural gas or utilities; volatility of our customers forecasts, financial conditions, market shares, product requirements or scheduling demands; adverse impacts of new technologies or other competitive pressures which increase our costs or erode our margins; failure to adequately insure or to identify environmental or other insurable risks; revised contract prices or estimates of major contract costs; risks of foreign operations; currency exchange rates; war, terrorism, computer hacking or other cyber attacks, or political uncertainty; unanticipated or uninsured disasters, losses or business risks; inaccurate data about markets, customers or business conditions; or unknown risks and uncertainties and the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
21
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K and thus are not required to report the quantitative and qualitative measures of market risk specified in Item 305 of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) required by Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b), our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in internal controls. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
Information regarding risk factors appears in MD&AForward-Looking Statements, in Part IItem 2 of this Form 10-Q and in Risk Factors in Part IItem 1A of our Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and Part II, Item 1A of our Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2011.
As of October 1, 2011, the Company had $6.9 million of goodwill on its consolidated balance sheet, all of which related to the Electronics Group business segment. During the third fiscal quarter of 2011, based on a combination of factors, including declines in revenues within the Electronics Group, declines in the overall government defense market and a decline in the Companys market capitalization, the Company concluded that there were sufficient indicators to require Sypris to perform an interim goodwill impairment analysis While this impairment analysis performed in the third fiscal quarter of 2011 did not result in any impairment charge, future events or circumstances, including a continuation of the factors noted above, could result in goodwill becoming impaired in future periods. Further, the Company's management must use judgment in making estimates of future operating results as part of this analysis. Future operating results could materially differ from the estimates and could either by itself or coupled with other factors described above require a provision for impairment in a future period which would result in a charge to income from operations in the year of the impairment with a resulting decrease in the Company's assets.
22
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On September 15, 2011, the restrictions expired on 10,000 shares of restricted common stock which had been granted to employees pursuant to the Companys equity compensation programs. As a result of such vesting, 3,465 shares were withheld by the Company to satisfy withholding tax obligations. The common shares withheld were immediately cancelled. The following table summarizes our repurchases during the third quarter ended October 2, 2011 (which consisted entirely of shares withheld to satisfy withholding taxes):
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as a Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
||||||||||||
September 15, 2011 |
3,465 | $ | 3.11 | | $ | |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]
None.
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
31(i).1 | CEO certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31(i).2 | CFO certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32 | CEO and CFO certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
23
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC. (Registrant) | ||||||
Date: November 8, 2011 | By: | /s/ Brian A. Lutes | ||||
(Brian A. Lutes) | ||||||
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 8, 2011 | By: | /s/ Rebecca R. Eckert | ||||
(Rebecca R. Eckert) | ||||||
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
24
Exhibit 31(i).1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Jeffrey T. Gill, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sypris Solutions, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 8, 2011 |
By: | /s/ Jeffrey T. Gill | ||||
Jeffrey T. Gill | ||||||
President & Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31(i).2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Brian A. Lutes, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sypris Solutions, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 8, 2011 |
By: | /s/ Brian A. Lutes | ||||
Brian A. Lutes | ||||||
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sypris Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Sypris Solutions, Inc., that to his knowledge:
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and |
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Date: November 8, 2011 |
By: | /s/ Jeffrey T. Gill | ||||
Jeffrey T. Gill | ||||||
President & Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
Date: November 8, 2011 |
By: | /s/ Brian A. Lutes | ||||
Brian A. Lutes | ||||||
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sypris Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Sypris Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.